|
|
|
|
|
by egwynn
3201 days ago
|
|
Sorry if I came across as condescending, that wasn’t my aim. It sounds like perhaps I misread your comment above and that maybe our respective arguments weren’t actually about the same thing. It’s easy to make too many assumptions about what people mean (especially in text-only conversations!) so I’d like to walk you through my thought process in interpreting your words in order to minimize ambiguity. When I was reading “the only reason they did that was because …”, I mentally substituted the pronouns to read “the only reason Apple didn’t support Flash on the original iPhone was because …”. And then I was left with “The only reason Apple didn’t support Flash on the original iPhone was because Flash portals were competing with their app store”. So that’s the idea that I was confronting. If that’s not the sentiment you were advancing, then the first thing we should do is settle it. |
|
But since I'm defending Flash, and saying something negative about Apple, let the downvotes begin.
But the blocking of Flash was a business decision, not a technical one, or even a "support the open web" one.
And so yes, if they allowed Flash, then portals were indeed a direct competitor to their app store. That is why they kept them out.