[wyattjoh]

One of the features offered by Talk is the ability to ignore comments from a specific user [1]. It is designed just as you described it here. As mentioned in a previous comment, our server api's should be sufficient for you as a site administrator, to write a plugin that would allow users to do exactly what you described. The idea with Talk is that we hand control to the newsroom, so they can enable or create the plugins that they like.

[1]: See a demo GIF on https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/ask-the-post/wp/2017/09/...

[unescape]

This is a step in the right direction, but why hand control to the newsroom as opposed to the user?

[s73ver_]

It is the newsroom's site.

[unescape]

Then this is evidence that comments should not be on the site. It's not the place of the newsroom to control discussion.

[s73ver_]

Then don't comment on their site? I mean if you're looking for discussion online, there are thousands of places to go. But this is specifically about the comment sections they provide. It seems entirely reasonable that a room they provide should be subject to their rules, and one violating those rules should be shown the door.

[unescape]

My observation is that Mozilla Talk does nothing to advance the decentralized Web, so why is it a good thing?

[s73ver_]

Just because something doesn't advance your pet cause doesn't mean it's not good.

The decentralized web does nothing to advance universal health care, so why is it a good thing?