|
|
|
|
|
by int_19h
3207 days ago
|
|
It's worth noting that Russia (then USSR) was the one that introduced the Latin alphabet in 1927 in the first place. Before that, it was Arabic. So, arguably, if they wanted to fully reverse the effects of imperialism, no matter the cost, they should go for Arabic. From a practical standpoint, though, Arabic doesn't make sense - it's more complicated to learn, vastly more different from the alphabets of all neighboring languages (starting with the whole right-to-left thing), and most other Turkic languages use Latin-based alphabets these days. But if the choice of Latin is dictated by pragmatic considerations, then it's reasonable to compare it to Cyrillic on the same grounds. |
|