Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by brianberns 3203 days ago
No. The odds of, say, the GPS in your mobile phone working by accident are effectively zero.
2 comments

It's not that it would work by accident, it would be more like it works by a principle to which our physics is a good enough approximation.
Yes, but then our physics wouldn't be "totally flawed". It would just be incomplete in some ways.
How large is the preimage of conclusions that would lead to the mathematics of relativity? Is it improbable in light of that?

I should also say that physics has a better track record than softer sciences. But even in physics, things change.

There's no member of that preimage in which modern science is totally flawed.
Yet we're posting in a thread relating to a massive replication crisis.

The geocentric model of the universe was equally obvious and functional to our ancestors in the context in which they used it. We are the same creatures as them and are subject to the same basic epistemological limitations -- just because we have seen further does not mean that we have seen everything. The whole concept of science is exactly to that point. It is implausible under currently available information that we could be missing some fact that would fundamentally change our understanding, but that is not the same thing as saying that there is no possible fact that could cause such a rupture.