[kbenson]

> And I think their urgency in removing it only shows how bad it really was, not how concerned they are for users.

Well, that only really shows how bad it might be or was being perceived and whatever backlash it might generate. It's entirely possible to feel like you have to backpedal on something that was meant entirely for the good of others because it's perceived as self serving (not that this situation maps to that, I'm making a general point).