[dickbasedregex]

Good! Can we not have a near perfect crop of complete losers next time? No one wants Zuck anymore than Hillary. Seems like a good way to lock in 4 more years of regret.

[sokoloff]

/me raises hand that I'd rather have Mark than Hillary. It's not so much that I agree with everything he says or stands for and I most certainly appreciate but don't idolize him. I'd rather have nearly any tech-savvy outsider than at least half the major party primary candidates last year.

[idle_processor]

I'd prefer someone less complicit in establishing the surveillance state.

[sokoloff]

Less complicit than Mark is what I assume you mean, though it was ambiguous in my mind whether you meant "than either of those two".

[jackhack]

Are we able to call someone who has been heavily funded by three-letter agencies for the benefit of mass surveillance, an "outsider?"

[aaron-lebo]

Being tech savvy is a poor qualification for leading the free world. He should get his own kingdom in order first.

[Markoff]

leading the free world? you really mean US is some leader of free world? in what filed exactly? living standard, healthcare, education, internet, etc? because I fail to see pretty much any positive field in which US would be world leader.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VMqcLUqYqrs

[TeMPOraL]

It's a well-known historical phrase. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_World#Leader_of_the_Free_....

Whether it is accurate now is another topic, though.

[Markoff]

apparently only Americans use this phrase, for everyone else it sound arrogant

[drzaiusapelord]

>No one wants Zuck anymore than Hillary.

Hillary won millions more votes than Trump.

Trump is at historic disapproval levels for a president at his time in office.

[aaronbrethorst]

More than 60 million people wanted Hillary to be president. It was a larger number than the number that wanted our current President.

[1337biz]

Don't worry. I think is charisma for a mainstream crowd is up on par with Shkreli.