|
|
|
|
|
by trcollinson
3198 days ago
|
|
I am not a lawyer, this isn't legal advice, and getting advice from random internet strangers like myself is stupid. But! With all that said, here's some advice. If you have a patent pending and you reasonably believe you will get the utility patent, allow BigCo to infringe it. Do not lawyer up more than is needed in order to get your patent from pending to issued. Now, start to sell your product with your patent pending technology. At the same time, use this as an advertising technique. "Our technology is so good, others are stealing it." "We're better than the rest, that's why they have to try to steal out technology." "The original, and still the best." Now, of course, make sure you are actually better than BigCo. Make sure your service is better. Make sure you provide the better product. Make sure you are winning the competition game. Remember, you have a pending patent. What can BigCo do? Use their stupidity to your advantage. Sell. Sell. Sell. |
|
So the things you say, and danieltillet says, are basically the things I'm looking for. And I hope more folks chime in too, particularly if they've experienced situations like this.
We are indeed starting to double/treble down on sales (thanks for the little "slogans" too). The majority opinion leans towards a fight, since for each seller we have BigCo has 100-1000. Their scale can let them get away with a cheap knockoff that mostly replicates the functionality but lacks in UI/UX. And I'm sure you know sellers are more interested in the scale, margins, etc. of a platform. So while we can take the market, it might have to be off more than just 1-2 patents.
Besides, there's always the hope that a court side with David rather than Goliath. And if they don't, and we lose the appeals too, we end up where we started and can only outsell them. And if we can survive long enough to win, we might as well get paid for lost revenues.