[mannykannot]

I hung on a bit longer, but lost any hope of seeing something relevant when he launched into an imaginary case study. Later on, we find him mentioning an actual study (of code reviews), only to dismiss its results as being implausible to him.

The author appears to have drunk so deeply of the dogma that he has no idea of how to make an objective case.

[whipoodle]

I thought it was funny he waved off the code review study as well. If the studies don't actually mean anything then why can't we similarly disregard the one that says TDD is good?