|
|
|
|
|
by SippinLean
3212 days ago
|
|
Re: your edit: >but I am not your research assistant Correct. Also correct: you need to cite specific examples to back up the claim, which you have not done. "A professor speculating" and the nebulous "others" are, again, not in such a prominent position as to speak for their "side" as a whole. >For spokesmen, Al Gore didn't mention jail Correct, which would make this not an example of "wanting to put nonbelievers of their view of the issue in prison," OP's only claim. |
|
Glad we cleared that up.
>Also correct: you need to cite specific examples to back up the claim, which you have not done.
Hmm. See above.
I chose to contribute to the conversation by pointing to examples of behavior that poison the discussion, in the spirit of thrill's comment.
I personally thought "death penalty" and "war crimes" were stronger examples than just "prison".
I did not attempt nor do I need to prove the ancestor literally correct, but just for fun, here are a couple of links that do - you'll have to decide if Bill Nye and Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. meet your criteria as "prominent" (which was not in thrill's post - just that they are in the news).
Rfk, jr. http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/sep/23/robert-kennedy... Koch brothers should be in prison in the Hague
Bill Nye http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/apr/14/bill-nye-open-... compares it to jailing guys from Enron
Examples, plural, specific, people in the news claiming their opponents should be imprisoned.
Good enough for me.