|
|
|
|
|
by redm
3207 days ago
|
|
This argument is akin to splitting hairs. The fraudster who applied for the loan against BigBank was at fault. The BigBank accepted the Fraud and reported it to the credit agency. The Credit Bureau reports/includes the data provided by BigBank; it's what they do. If there is a dispute between what BigBank says and what Alice says, it's not necessarily so easy to resolve, and that's the position the Credit Bureau has to deal with. To absolve the fraudster of the primary fault is ridiculous. That said, this is the problem with difficulties in identity verification, we all want privacy and security at the same time. While they are not mutually exclusive, having both is much more complicated than one or the other. |
|