|
|
|
|
|
by hyperbovine
5823 days ago
|
|
It's weird, but as a stats guy, this makes total sense to me. They are sampling a small (hopefully random) group of internet users in order to draw conclusions about how the population at large behaves. It's no different than a political poll. Just like political pollsters, they express their results in relative terms to sidestep the much trickier issue of guessing N, the population size. Hence pollsters do not try to estimate voter turnout, and Alexa does not try to estimate how many people are online. FWIW, the firms who are giving absolute viewer totals are (I'm pretty sure) just taking this a step further by estimating the total number of people online and multiplying. This is a way harder estimation problem, which explains why the resulting numbers are all over the map. The Alexa data is not any more worthless, just less ambitious. |
|
And that's exactly whats happening, Alexa relies on people who install Alexa toolbar and from what I remember reading most of Alexa users are from South-east asia, or more precisely, from India.
This is so dubious, its not even funny.