Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by ska 3212 days ago
"bad" for what purpose? The linear congruent stuff and Mersenne twisters, for example, are leaps and bounds better than a typical rand() implementation, and very appropriate for many uses.
1 comments

Sure, but we have generators now that are both faster and better, so there's no point in using the standard ones, aside for convenience.

    aside for convenience.
You say that as if it is a small thing. Convenience, lack of additional code to maintain, consistency across platforms - for many projects these things will easily trump any algorithmic improvements from using something else.