|
|
|
|
|
by criddell
3213 days ago
|
|
The likelihood of either of those scenarios is pretty tiny. The value of DNA sequencing and virtual assistants is real and substantial. I don't like the better-safe-than-sorry argument when it comes to security. I think it leads to bad policy and bad decisions. I've been thinking about this after I read a story[1] about a family that has been told that they cannot let their young kids ride a city bus by themselves. It's a similar argument - the value of kids gaining independence is big and the risk of something atrocious happening is tiny. [1]:https://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2017/09/06/a-dad-in-bc-l... |
|
Depends on your lifestyle and how valuable you think these things are, but I find these things almost entirely valueless. I think virtual assistants are basically total trash - I can type my query on my damn phone faster and more accurately than the Echo or Google can get it - and I just see no value in DNA sequencing unless you're looking for a specific medical condition, the fluffy interest in stuff like racial makeup just seems like a shitty trade-off to me.