|
Yes, I agree. If everyone would just avoid those C stdlib functions everything would be peachy. :) I was agreeing with you, but just adding caveats. :) Well, except... some problems surface when interfacing with "things" (libraries, OS'es) written by other people... and there's no escaping those problems, fundamentally. It's C.
Of course UTF-8 was invented with the express purpose of being "C-compatible", but... what happens if you have a string with a NUL in it and you pass that to the POSIX (I think?) printf function as an argument for a "%s" format string? Well, it gets truncated. Did you mean for that to happen, or didn't you? Who knows? That's the problem. Honestly, I'm not trying to win "internet points" or something. It's just that C, as I'm trying to point out, is a bad language for almost everything that's required for a "user-facing" languages these days. Write the thing in C#, Java, O'Caml, Qt[1], or Haskell, or whatever... but please don't think you need to write in a sort of weird approximiation of the old PDP. [1] Yeah, yeah, not a language, but it's at least an ecosystem that seems to be moderately successful. |