[laughinghan]

My friends had him and I hear Jonathan Shewchuck is indeed an excellent teacher. However, he has never been a CMU professor. In 1994, when your link was dated, he was getting his PhD at CMU, and since 1998 he's been a professor at UC Berkeley (where I went): https://people.eecs.berkeley.edu/~jrs/

I have no doubts about CMU's excellence, but I found Berkeley's undergrad CS education to be quite good. There certainly were research professors who were bad teachers, but many like Shewchuck were outstanding teachers, and there were also several Teaching Professors whose job description to focus is more on teaching than research, like Dan Garcia, Paul Hilfinger, John DeNero, and Brian Harvey (since retired): https://www2.eecs.berkeley.edu/Faculty/Lists/faculty.html

I too have heard that private schools like Harvard and Stanford are not very hard once you get in, just very hard to get into (though I can't speak from experience). I haven't heard people say that about Berkeley, which is a public school so it doesn't have shareholders where alumni can form a controlling majority, and it's funded more by the state than by tuition. That also certainly was not the experience of myself or anyone I know.

[cbHXBY1D]

I also studied EECS at Berkeley and had Shewchuck.

There's this mentality at Berkeley that the EECS classes are the hardest and most competitive in the country (and that private schools just give everyone A's) but after meeting many CMU graduates I realized that it's program is also similarly rigorous. The classes might not be as competitive but then again I don't think that means it's worse for it.