Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by microcolonel 3219 days ago
The other thought, I imagine, is that they felt the probability was low that they would see a flood of this scale even within their lifetime; that ended up being a poor bet. Even so, flood insurance is also cheaper when the perceived likelihood of a flood is low.
1 comments

Since cities usually survive much more than one human lifetime, this is not good reasoning.
People build houses, cities don't.
As you almost certainly know, the city controls permissions for every building.

A city that gives planning permission for a development that is probably going to be destroyed with loss of life in the next hundred years is not serving people well.