|
|
|
|
|
by sapienthomo
3218 days ago
|
|
As they say: Is that a lot? I hate the way headlines measure things in useless units, just to get a bigger exponent. Why didn't they say it was 19000 trillion teaspoons? That's just as easy -- i.e. impossible -- to visualize. I think a possibly easier-to-visualize description is enough water to cover the whole state of Texas six inches deep. |
|
They included several other visualization descriptions in the article. They can't put it all in the headline.