|
|
|
|
|
by yebyen
3220 days ago
|
|
Just playing devil's advocate, what is the possible danger of accepting a consent form with a signature in pencil? Is someone going to erase a signature from the consent form? (And how exactly is that a potential risk or danger?) I'm pretty sure that it's not any harder to forge a signature when it's made using pen or pencil. It's just a mark that says "I agree." It's not a bank form where the validity of the amount tendered could be called into question. |
|
"Oops, I forgot about presenting my subjects with the consent form and now I've got 100 results collected during a whole year of work.
I definitely don't want to throw all of that work away... But if I contact them and make them sign the form now using pencil, I could erase the date and change it to each subject's day of experiment. Nobody would notice."
Pen raising that barrier. I agree that against an adversary fully committed to fraud it doesn't matter. But that threat model is exceptionally rare, and an IRB can do little about it anyway (e.g. the whole application could be made up, the experiment consisting of something completely different). The realistic threat they fight against is experimenters that don't know better, and think there'd be no harm in their actions.
And this is just me coming up with a possibility in a few minutes. Reality tends to be richer than a single person's imagination.