|
|
|
|
|
by kuschku
3221 days ago
|
|
Actually, Germany limits both of these rights, heavily. The right of assembly is only given in indoor spaces, which you own, as long as zero aggression happens. For outdoor assemblies, you'll need approval of the municipal government (and the police can dissolve your assembly, as happened in Hamburg during the G20 protests). In the same way, as I mentioned, the right to property is frequently limited by nations. In the US, commonly for public projects the state seizes land without repaying the owners, and Germany does similar stuff. |
|
* not in all cases (e.g. Spontandemonstration, where there is no time to file an application)
* the municipal government needs a really good reason to not give approval
* the courts are very sympathetic to virtually any cause should a municipal government decide to forbid a gathering.
> (and the police can dissolve your assembly,
* if there is true danger to the general public. Again, courts are going to slap the police around if they do this just because.
I know how easy it is to use a blanket statement as a base for another blanket statement which is equally one-sided, but please try to build arguments in a less ... attackable way.