|
|
|
|
|
by bsder
3220 days ago
|
|
You have to weigh the death toll of the evacuation against the death toll of the disaster. We see the flooding issue right now--an evacuation would have killed far more people. A dirty bomb? Once the bomb goes off you will have plenty of time to evacuate where you need to. Keeping radioactivity contained would be more problematic than removing people. A biological agent? You want to quarantine rather than evacuate. A fire? San Diego showed how to deal with that--phased evacuations ahead of the actual fire path. Earthquake? Well, once it's done you have plenty of time to evacuate. I can't really think of anything that would affect something the size of Houston simultaneously. |
|