|
|
|
|
|
|
by JimDabell
3222 days ago
|
|
|
> They complain about Dockerfiles and have a broken link to some project with 288 commits, without even acknowledging that a Dockerfile isn't needed to build a docker image. They literally say that a Dockerfile isn't necessary in the same sentence as the broken link you mention: > This brings us to Buildah, which is an open source tool for building containers without using Dockerfile at all. What's the significance of the number of commits? |
|
|
They say "It has been four years and we still have to use Dockerfile, which is a horrible version of bash." They say "we still have to use Dockerfile". They _never_ _had_ to use Dockerfile.