[britman]

Everyone is pretty quick to criticise Ballmer and Microsoft and while he does spout a lot of nonsense has anybody actually evaluated Microsoft's cloud platform....from the comments I would say no.

I have and I have to say it's an excellent platform, it has a good feature set, competitive pricing (matches EC2) and they're doing tonnes of work to it and throwing a lot of cash at it. It's not tied to the .Net framework(you can run php, Java, RoR etc etc on it).

Interestingly they also announced Windows Azure appliance yesterday at WPC10 which is the first proper effort to solve to private cloud problem and having spoken to businesses looking at our product this is definitely an issue for B2B SaaS applications.

I just don't understand the immediate disregard for anything Microsoft does, yes IE has been sh*t however it's foolish to write off every new MSFT offering as the "next IE" without understanding what it is offering.

[aufreak3]

You're right that they could actually make an impact.

Now with F# and clojure available as dev languages on .net (soon, if not now), maybe even the "cool kids" will find it fun. Cheering google over msft has been fun, but what we're really cheering for is choice. You don't want only one player in the cloud space.

Further, if they can offer DirectCompute in azure, that'll be a huge differentiator that'll attract the processing intensive apps.

[hga]

How much effort will Microsoft have to go to for people to not assume it's inextricably tied to .NET?

Would they do that anyway, since it's implicitly saying there are better things than it?

[WorkerBee]

Yep. The headline is absolutely no surprise considering how much development and promotion effort is going into Azure.