|
|
|
|
|
|
by tjr
3222 days ago
|
|
|
Something else interesting is that the notion of engineered aerospace software does not necessarily have anything to do with the software itself. A lone hacker in their garage very well could author the exact same software. The difference is in how it was developed, and that there exists a paper trail to demonstrate it was developed and reviewed to sufficient standards. Requirements and tests and reviews don't get installed on the aircraft; the executable object code gets installed on the aircraft. One might posit that "software engineering" is not very much about developing the actual software at all, but just ensuring that it is done correctly? |
|
|