|
|
|
|
|
by rpiguy
3223 days ago
|
|
I don't think there is clear cut answer to that question. It may depend on the company in question. For Google that supplies 78% of all search results it is probably dangerous to allow them to decide what to favor and what to censor. For a smaller service provider like Cloudflare, I am not so sure. It will be interesting to see how it would go down in court. I am not a lawyer or legal expert by any means, but if the courts decided that business have to serve the public, for example forcing a baker to bake a wedding cake for a gay wedding, I can see a court forcing Cloudflare to host content they don't want to host. Now the interpretation of the law today would not support that because minority opinion holders are not a protected class, but the court extends its power all the time and I could see this leap being made, although it is unlikely. All in all interesting stuff to ponder. |
|