Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by fraserharris 3226 days ago
They received a preservation order requiring they do not delete the logs for this domain for period of time prior to the inauguration.
2 comments

I'm asking why these records were held in the first place. If they didn't store the data in the first place, there'd be nothing to preserve. The government could send preservation orders all they want and Dreamhost wouldn't even have to go to court because they could comply without hurting their customers' privacy.
How is that legally sound?
18 USC ยง 2703(f) - A provider of wire or electronic communication services or a remote computing service, upon the request of a governmental entity, shall take all necessary steps to preserve records and other evidence in its possession pending the issuance of a court order or other process.
OK, let me be more specific. How is the request legally sound?
I don't understand your question. What's there to be legally sound about? The Feds make a request, the site has to comply.
Why are they allowed to request this with no reason? Why can the government dictate what I'm doing with no legal basis?