Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by patrickaljord 5817 days ago
Why is "unencrypted" considered a good thing? I find it kind of scary especially for a video conference app.
3 comments

It's much easier to add encryption to an unencrypted channel than it is to interoperate with a fully encrypted one. As a user you might be more interested in encryption as soon as possible, but to the average HN reader an unencrypted standards-based stack is good news!
Your phone calls aren't point-to-point encrypted, either.
No, not end-to-end, but they are encrypted between your phone and the cell tower.

It's considerably more secure than an open wifi network.

GSM supports optional encryption, but there's no notification to the user whether a given call is encrypted.
Yes, but I'm pretty sure all US carriers use it all the time

(Though it's true that this opens you up to a potential MITM attack by a well equipped adversary, it's still a far cry from an open wifi network)

Remember all those scandals where politicians sent sexy texts to people they weren't supposed to? Video looks a lot better on the evening news.

Cue first FaceTime scandal in 3, 2...

I'm pretty sure those are usually leaked, not intercepted.
I may be missing something, but isn’t he saying that the FaceTime call, once initiated by a traditional phone call, is encrypted?

“Only the call part is Vanilla SIP. The procedure for registering a Facetime user into their servers etc. is all non-SIP, encrypted/ciphered.”