|
|
|
|
|
by tray5
3215 days ago
|
|
If the stats in the article are true, 96% less greenhouse emissions, 45% less energy, 99% less land use and 96% less water used in the production of the lab meat, I think it makes perfect sense to call it clean meat. Plus it doesn't involve the death of an animal, which is pretty "clean" I guess. |
|
"Clean" food means something very different than "clean" energy.
If I'm looking for clean food, my standards are very different than someone looking for clean energy. I know folks who wouldn't think lab grown meat was very clean simply because it was created in a lab.
All that to say: you're not wrong, but clean means something very different to the food-conscious person shopping at their local co-op.