Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by hp 3219 days ago
yep. as noted in https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8648995 it wasn't even just dcop - KDE had tried CORBA before switching to DCOP, and GNOME of course tried CORBA (two different ORBs), then tried Bonobo-on-top-of-CORBA, and SOAP. There were tons of documented protocols on top of X11 (many still in use today). And that's ignoring the countless ad-hoc solutions that various apps used...

Linux desktops are implemented as process swarms and communication among processes is one of the central things they have to deal with.
1 comments
atemerev 3218 days ago
CORBA and SOAP are things that must not be named... The horror is too real. Of course, Dbus is better than CORBA and SOAP, almost anything is.

How old is CORBA, again? And how crazy is SOAP?

link
hp 3218 days ago
It isn't better than those categorically. But it's definitely better than them for building a multi-process desktop.

"better" depends on what you are trying to do.

Of course CORBA and SOAP are considered old and horrible now, 15 years later. But currently-popular stuff is in many ways equally unsuited to coordination of local desktop processes, because it's not designed for that.

link