[ordu]

Doesn't Go have any syntactic sugar for pass errors out of function? Something like Rust's Carrier/From traits and try! or `?`.

[camus2]

No, go "errors" are just a convention, there is absolutely nothing special about them.

Go has panic/defer, which are exceptions, but done badly. They were probably retrofitted in the language when its creators realized they needed exceptions anyway, which makes the whole "error as value" a bit hypocritical. If they truly cared about error as value, then yes, Go would support some form of try! macro.

[stevedonovan]

Yes, Rust would be seriously irritating without try! (and its short friend the question mark operator). So I feel the pain of gophers here.

[pjmlp]

Not really, Go community tends to be very vocal against syntactic sugar.