|
|
|
|
|
by PeanutCurry
3225 days ago
|
|
I don't think they're ignoring the issue, I think you're pushing an issue that they've already explained in parts of their statement that you chose not to quote. >
st3fan: Because that library is there does not mean that we are giving data to Google. It does not even mean that it is active or that it is sending anything. Having gone through the comment chain in other places it seems like your entire position in the debate between you and st3fan is based on ignoring what he's actually saying in general. In response to their request for evidence your responded >That's pretty simple. Don't use proprietary software. which sidesteps the query entirely and does nothing to lend credibility to your original position. I don't expect to change your mind and frankly I don't have a reason to, but if your goal is to have productive or persuasive conversations then you may want to evaluate your current communication strategy. |
|