Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by BoringCode 3225 days ago
Misleading comment.

7.08 (a) 2 specifically applies to the scenario like in this comment:

> Rule 7.08(a) Comment: Any runner after reaching first base who leaves the base path heading for his dugout or his position believing that there is no further play, may be declared out if the umpire judges the act of the runner to be considered abandoning his efforts to run the bases. Even though an out is called, the ball remains in play in regard to any other runner.

Essentially the runner has to obviously abandon his attempt to reach the next base. In the scenario outlined in the article the runner is still advancing to the next base, trying to draw a throw. According to your interpretation, any runner taking a lead without specifically advancing should be out, which is incorrect.

When it comes to judgement calls like this it all comes down to the umpire. Many umpires have noted[1] that this is a legal play. And it was ruled as such in the article's example. Calling it "misleading reporting" is a smear on a very well written story about an edge case that isn't clear cut.

(I will note that is very easy for the offense to execute incorrectly and for the umpires to get it wrong. For example: https://youtu.be/WnI4KlUNf38)

[1] http://www.austinumpires.org/skunkplay.html

1 comments

I don't think the comment limits the meaning of abandonment, but rather gives an interpretation for a specific circumstance. Here's some umpires debating this rule: http://www.umpire.org/vb/showthread.php?s=2e5e11d3b28b94683f...