|
|
|
|
|
|
by nl
3231 days ago
|
|
|
Can you define what you mean by socialist? It seems to me that critics of the government in non-democratic countries are the ones in danger, while the ones in democracies aren't, even in socialist democracies (eg, Scandinavia). If you don't consider these countries socialist that's ok, but the danger government critics are in within non-socialist dictatorships is something worth considering. |
|
|
Apparently, anything that fails eventually is not socialist. Hence, "No True Scotsman".
> If you don't consider these countries socialist that's ok, but the danger government critics are in within non-socialist dictatorships is something worth considering.
I don't consider these countries socialist. They're not "socialist democracies" (no such thing exists as far as I can see). They're commonly called "social democracies", but that's because the word "social" is political capital. The word "socialist" on the other hand is rather toxic, so most of the mainstream left parties call themselves "social democratic". They may have a bit of "socialist" policy, but not much more so than e.g. the US. Their economic system is fundamentally capitalist.