|
|
|
|
|
|
by mitko
5830 days ago
|
|
|
one way to mimic the successes of these people is to do what they do Disagree. Thinking like that is a common logical fallacy. Suppose you find a relation "isHacker?" <~> "schedule type". Then you have NO evidence at all that that these are related since your whole sample are hackers. Also you don't know anything about the causality. Even if there is some relation (which I doubt) probably there are some other reasons and "reasons" ~> "isHacker?" and "reasons" ~> "schedule type" ~ is for probability. |
|
|