Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by synicalx 3232 days ago
I'm sure the parties involved in transferring $160M via an anonymous and untraceable currency had perfectly legitimate reasons for doing so /s.
2 comments

Wasn't anonymous OR untraceable, which is clearly evidenced by the fact that we all know about it and can see it on the public blockchain.
Ok, then who has the money now?
Wasn't anonymous or untraceable.