Anyone here who can honestly say that they worked through all volumes (obviously not answering everything)? I often hear people talk about it but never met anyone in real life who actually did this.
I have read through about eight pages of one of Knuth's most recent pre-fascicles.[1] It took me about a month (on and off). I did all the exercises (trying the harder ones for at most a couple of hours or so before giving up), wrote programs to explore the things introduced, etc. It was good, quite doable, and a lot of fun. (Also, I found a few errors and got some of those Knuth checks.)
The best way to view Knuth's project with these volumes is that takes in all published computer science on a particular topic, digests it, and outputs into the books some sort of "summary" of the field, or whatever he considers the most important bits, but still organized as readable/learnable textbook material, and in the way he thinks makes for best exposition. (In other words: he's doing his best to explain, and his best is very good indeed. Often Knuth's writing is clearer than the original papers, and a lot more fun.)
I read the volumes roughly 30mins a day, and try most of the exercises. Like the above linked blog post I at least attempt to just understand the question on the M[40]+ exercises which still can teach you something by merely understanding why it's a difficult problem.
I read all 3 volumes of the 2nd edition in the 90s. A couple of the long difficult proofs I glossed over. IIRC I read all the problems, but can't say I worked through very many. Vol 4a is on the coffee table in my office and I occasionally read some random passage.
I'm sure Donald Knuth has!
Seriously, this is a life goal for me to read and understand these works, especially after I read that Bill Gates said he would hire anyone that had done.[0]
Not sure that its going to happen though, as the maths is slowing me down!
[0]http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/bill-gates-once-s...
I'm sure someone has. If I was interested enough I supposed I could over a sufficiently long length of time? I do love reading Knuth, but I struggle with sticking with single books/topics for long lengths of time so I doubt I could keep it up for all the volumes.
The best way to view Knuth's project with these volumes is that takes in all published computer science on a particular topic, digests it, and outputs into the books some sort of "summary" of the field, or whatever he considers the most important bits, but still organized as readable/learnable textbook material, and in the way he thinks makes for best exposition. (In other words: he's doing his best to explain, and his best is very good indeed. Often Knuth's writing is clearer than the original papers, and a lot more fun.)
[1]: http://www.cs.utsa.edu/~wagner/knuth/