[infiniteparamtr]

I've been teaching myself C, with the intention of learning how to write code for embedded applications where efficiency is key.

It seems to me that new languages prioritize quick iteration over effective machine operation. The easier a language is to write and interpret, the faster an outfit can churn out an application. The exponential computing power growth has been sufficient enough to absorb these collective "shortcuts". Thus, it is not being taken advantage of properly.

The CSCI/Engineering fields have become more of a gold rush than thoughtful trades. Boot camp management seeks profit, and trainees seek to quickly fill high paying jobs. It all culminates into this situation where code doesn't need to be clever and thought out - just created A.S.A.P to handle whatever trending niche market or "low-hanging fruit" there is. The work of these products get handled server side, where electrical costs for cooling is a fundamental expense.

[shmerl]

Rust is new. It's made with performance in mind.

[shpongled]

I want to second Rust. I've been writing C for 5+ years and finally decided to give Rust a serious try... and I love it. I never ever thought I would say this, but I don't see myself going back to C (with minor exceptions)

[flavio81]

I recall being excited the first time i learnt C. But after i learnt other programming languages, the defects of C started to appear clearly before my eyes. C++ is even worse (in terms of things that look like hastily designed)

Rust is comparably more coherent and elegantly designed.

[CrystalGamma]

That was pretty much my reaction too, as someone whose first programming language was C …