[richmarr]

> If James wrote what you said he did above, (I think you mischaracterize him greatly)...

By all means ignore the part relating to honesty/competence, I'd probably apologise to him for that if I met him so probably shouldn't have written it.

Most of my comments however speak to his actions so are not a matter of characterisation.

> ...surely Google employs someone intelligent enough to go point by point through his memo and really school him

They do. They have. However, Damore violated Google's code of conduct and by extension his conditions of employment. That's not a line any employer of thousands can play coy with in the name of educating one individual.

> Such a response would do more to build a case for the worldview you appear to espouse than the lazy, generalized retorts being lobbed his way.

Who's mischaracterising now?

Sorry boss, you haven't read the right responses. I link to some better ones from mine: https://medium.com/finding-needles-in-haystacks/we-need-to-t...