[zanny]

You buy goods with bitcoin by converting it to usd. Nothing is priced (at least for extended lengths of time) in bitcoin, because of the price voltaility, because of the pyramid scheme.

And yes, your perception of the value of something does influence whether or not it is a pyramid scheme. If you buy 10,000 scented soaps because you want a ton of scented soap that isn't a pyramid scheme. If you buy 10,000 scented soaps thinking you can find 1,000 people to buy them off you at more than you paid for them, then you are dealing with a pyramid scheme.

Fundamentally, the price growth most bitcoin users (you would be in the minority) want depends on a definitional pyramid scheme of attracting new money to drive up the price of bitcoin. It isn't even debatable - the coin minting model of btc that declines over time directly maps to how to run a pyramid scheme on it, where early adopters get the most return.

Most IPOs are pyramid schemes. The stock traded price of gold is a pyramid scheme. Any system where you participate on the assumption of scarcity going up, and thus your piece becoming more valuable on the backs of new entrants to the market is a pyramid scheme.

[TheSpiceIsLife]

> If you buy 10,000 scented soaps thinking you can find 1,000 people to buy them off you at more than you paid for them, then you are dealing with a pyramid scheme.

I'd argue that is run-of-the-mill wholesale / retail sales.

Expecting to make a profit doesn't cause a thing to be a pyramid scheme.

[zanny]

There is a distinction between pyramid schemes and ponzie / multi-level marketing schemes. Pyramid schemes aren't implicitly bad - they just mean the last "ladder rung" of the pyramid will lose on the promise of the scheme while anyone who got in before the last profit.

You expect to make a profit on the foundational principles of pyramid schemes. Someone will eventually, inevitably, have to not make a profit because the market of bitcoin will be fully saturated. At which point the value of bitcoin has to be reconsidered - it no longer would be poised to grow through increasing scarcity, so it would need to derive value through other measures.

Whether that happens in a year or a century is the gamble.