|
|
|
|
|
|
by razwall
3228 days ago
|
|
|
Indeed, and the court rejected that part of HiQ's argument. "In light of the potentially sweeping implications discussed above and the lack of any more direct authority, the Court cannot conclude that hiQ has at this juncture raised 'serious questions' that LinkedIn's conduct violates its constitutional rights under the California Constitution." |
|
|