|
|
|
|
|
by jtl999
3230 days ago
|
|
I doubt that if he was a serious criminal that created and USED said banking malware for a fraud, and the FBI clearly had victim impact statements, that he would get such a lenient set of bail conditions. The longer this case goes on the stranger it gets. My current working theory is that the FBI was investigating the Kronos malware, caught one of the developers and/or sellers and they knew he was working with someone, but not who, and this redacted person didn't like MalwareTech for any myriad of reasons so he claimed, as an informant that the other developer was MalwareTech. Like I said, just a theory. I could be wrong and we haven't seen the FBI's evidence. |
|