[unityByFreedom]

It's the premise that is the most controversial, not the conclusion.

People can debate all day over whether America's current system is sustainable. When they start to suggest the inclusion of the female vote is part of the reason for that, they're understandably going to face some backlash, regardless of whatever corrections they make in the future. What he wrote is clear enough, and his correction can be understood by conservatives to be insincere, since it was forced on him by the mainstream view.

[leereeves]

It's hard to deny that women vote against capitalists more often.

Why is it wrong to speak the truth?

[unityByFreedom]

> It's hard to deny that women vote against capitalists more often.

> Why is it wrong to speak the truth?

One could argue that some degree of voting against extreme capitalists has allowed capitalism to endure.

Women got the vote 100 years ago, and America still has the dominant marketplace in the world.

Capitalism has expanded across the world since that time. Even China has largely embraced capitalism.

Nothing is wrong with speaking either a truth or a theory.

However, what you put forward isn't based on any research and sounds more like a stereotype, or your personal experience, than an objective truth backed by science.

In those cases, there can be more than meets the eye.