|
|
|
|
|
|
by masklinn
3233 days ago
|
|
|
> Why is 418 the particular target? Because Mark Nottingham (co-chair of the HTTP WG) first tried to get libraries/stdlibs to remove support for 418 (as part of builtins, since it's not a formally standardised code, he had no issue with application-specific support, everyone is free to return whatever status codes they wish) and faced some pushback, he switched to the alternate tack of getting it into a standard. |
|
|