Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by seanmcdirmid 3232 days ago
> And second, Google, Facebook, and YouTube are obviously not essential, cause those millions get by just fine without them.

What's more, in parts of China where these websites aren't blocked (Hong Kong, Taiwan if we call it a part of China), they become very popular again and the mainland Chinese alternatives fall off the map.

2 comments

The network lockin effect is very strong, sadly.

This is why such sites without real alternatives should be controlled by society, and not by companies where two people hold the majority of voting rights.

I disagree. I trust Larry and Sergei more than I trust Xi and Li.
The question is if the power is actually with Larry and Sergei, or if someone more powerful could easily seize power from them, or pressure them into doing something they want.

If Larry or Sergei die, do you trust all their inheritors? Do you trust all people who can threaten Larry or Sergei?

I don't.

Do you true the next secretly chosen and annointed royal red family president after Xi? That's if Xi actually decides to leave after his term is up, of course.
That's exactly the question, and the issue.

And that's why you should trust the chinese government, Google, private internet access, etc all equally much.

The third world and first world version of these problems are similar in form but completely different in magnitudes.
Those places are different cultures and sifferent social groups.

I can also give the example of Japan and Korea in which Facebook is not very popular.

Facebook is medium popular in Japan, lots of Japanese have Facebook accounts, no idea about Korea. Nobody is really using wechat outside of china unless they have a strong connection to china.
They have them but I rarely encountered any that actively used it, although Instagram was quite popular.