[roninb]

Wait, where do you see anywhere in the ruling a decision about anything other than whether the judge should've been recused or not...?

[leereeves]

Section II B, about the summary judgement and the motion to dismiss.

It's very short because the appeals court ruled that the district court was correct "without opinion".

[roninb]

But again, that literally has nothing to do with filming in court and only whether or not the judge should've recused themself...

Where in "Akins also argues that the district court erred by granting the motions todismiss and for summary judgment filed by the defendants and by denying his ownmotion for partial summary judgment" is there anything about filming anyone?

[leereeves]

In that those rulings by the district court dismissed Akin's claims that his rights were violated by police retaliating for his filming.