| Assuming you've looked at the actual document (https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3914586/Googles-I...) and not redacted/censored versions of it, it does in fact have a lot of links...[0] How many citations would you expect though? He's not publishing for an academic journal. He's not even publishing for an audience outside of coworkers. [0] Links from the paper in order not counting internal g/ go/ links, whatever those are (not all of them technically citations, but some are; many just to help point out that a technical definition is being used and a common parlance one the reader may have in mind shouldn't be used): https://www.jstor.org/stable/25098770?seq=1#page_scan_tab_co... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_liberalism http://righteousmind.com/largest-study-of-libertarian-psych/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_differences_in_psychology#... http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1111/j.1751-9004.... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Empathizing%E2%80%93systemizin... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuroticism http://www.bradley.edu/dotAsset/165918.pdf (My favorite in-context just because the link text is "research suggests", a common phrase that all too commonly lacks any sort of citation or link of any kind.) http://quillette.com/2017/07/15/time-stop-worrying-first-wor... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occupational_fatality#Risk_fac... https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2000/05/the-war... http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/01623095929... https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5068300/ https://is.muni.cz/el/1423/jaro2011/SPP457/um/23632422/Hakim... https://groups.google.com/a/google.com/d/msg/coffee-beans-di... http://www.businessforum.com/WSJ_Race-on-Campus-05-06-2016.p... https://www.city-journal.org/html/real-war-science-14782.htm... https://heterodoxacademy.org/problems/ http://www.newyorker.com/science/maria-konnikova/social-psyc... https://becauseits2015.wordpress.com/2016/08/06/a-non-femini... http://www.warrenfarrell.net/Summary/ https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/beautiful-minds/the-per... http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1467-9280.00139 https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/rabble-rouser/201209/li... https://nypost.com/2016/04/17/conservative-professors-must-f... https://www.chicagoreader.com/Bleader/archives/2011/08/18/44... https://www.google.com/search?q=political+correctness https://bostonreview.net/forum/paul-bloom-against-empathy https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2017/07/why-it... http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1745691616659391... https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jjycJDLHc9oixA7FiG3-M2yJ... http://www.spsp.org/blog/stereotype-accuracy-response |
Someone with his credentials should not expect to be spoon fed justifications for company hiring practices. If he had opened discussion on the validity of specific findings and which experiments contain the most valuable information for predicting benefits of policy changes, I don't think there would have been this outcry.
But if he wants to discuss the science he first needs to make it clear that he's read it.