Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by serpix 3235 days ago
That is horrible mileage. I remember averaging that on a 1997 Opel Astra.
4 comments

Your Astra weighed 1000lbs less, had no air conditioning and probably no air bags and would have probably killed you in a 40mph collision though, innit?
And that mileage was presumably measured using imperial gallons, which are 20% larger than US gallons. And it probably didn't get 40mpg anyway unless it was on the highway 100% of the time.

http://www.carfolio.com/specifications/models/car/?car=26732...

Any chance your MPG was measured on imperial gallons? Looks like 40MPG imperial would be normal for that car, but 40MPG US would be a fair bit more than expected.
As long as we're one-upping, I'll jump in here to say that my Nissan Leaf gets 140 MPG ;)
You're trolling, right? 40mpg is pretty great.
In certain contexts, certainly.

Modern small cars with small engines can be quite fuel efficient in highway driving, though, and there 40 mpg isn't quite the very top. A month ago or so I did a trip in a 2016 Seat Toledo (petrol, non-hybrid), and the drive computer reported the consumption as 3.9 L/100 km after 150 km of driving at speeds from 60 to 100 km/h, averaging IIRC 78 km/h.

A 80 km strip at 120 km/h increased the average to 4.2 L/100 km.