Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by smegel 3241 days ago
Pity we will never see a genuine version of uTorrent that will support it. That was a real loss.
3 comments

We have plenty of good open source alternatives now. qTorrent works fine
Thanks I haven't hear of that. And it is written in C++ which is nice.

Is it considered the spiritual successor to the original uTorrent?

it is:

>The qBittorrent project aims to provide an open-source software alternative to µTorrent.

though in my experience it is more of a memory hog and buggier than utorrent. but that doesn't stop me from using it

I've switched to transmission client and never looked back (4 yrs ago)
It's nowhere near as perfect as utorrent once was. But it's pretty good and I have plenty of extra memory (it's currently using 305mb while seeding 40+ torrents, dropping down to 65mb if I pause them all.)
I wouldn't be surprised if qbittorrent predates uTorrent; Wikipedia says it dates to 2006. But it wasn't popular on windows until uTorrent started doing dodgy things.
I love qtorrent. They even have built in torrents search for various sites like TPB and Linux isos ;)
Sorry I am not sure why is that. Would you mind explaining?
uTorrent used to be really efficient, small memory-footprint, full featured bittorrent-client. One of the best software I've ever used to download... perfectly legal content [1] from the internets.

Now it's full of ads and performs poorly.

[1] Like all the different Linux distro install images over and over again.

Take a look at rtorrent: https://github.com/rakshasa/rtorrent

It fits the efficient, small memory-footprint and no ads requirements. "Full Featured" is subjective as it depends upon what you consider "Full Featured".

Full featured means that it efficiently implements all the bells and whistles of the most recent bittorrent protocol. And only that, nothing extra.
I found qBittorrent to be very adequate and full of good options to provide you granularity on how would you like to manage your upload traffic.