Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by truffle_pig 3240 days ago
Yeah was trying to communicate "moderate risk", but it's kinda tongue in cheek.
2 comments

We got the tongue in cheek point of the comment. However what is being discussed is the ordering. Defcon 1 is more serious than Defcon 5. ie it counts backwards from 5 to 1 as situations become more serious. So your comment should be Defcon 2.

Pedantics aside, I did enjoy those little comments you put alongside the threat level.

You can just write DEFCON 3 and this will communicate the same "moderate risk" message to everyone, no matter their understanding of how DEFCON levels work.