|
|
|
|
|
by szemet
3237 days ago
|
|
Yes. It is the is-ought [1] distinction. People differences may be a biological fact, but this factual knowledge does not informs us what to do with it. We can do then anything: amplify it, suppress it, or don't care "Natural"[2] - if it has any meaningful definition at all - is not an ethical category. Evolution is not normative. [1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Is–ought_problem [2] For example for a naturalist everything is natural :) |
|