|
|
|
|
|
|
by laughinghan
3234 days ago
|
|
|
> First of all, what evidence? You might be interested in this blogpost which cites 27 different peer-reviewed scientific papers supporting an argument that social priming can explain much of observed gender gaps in STEM (and another 9 more scientific papers just to flesh out the argument): http://mitadmissions.org/blogs/entry/picture-yourself-as-a-s... > "Make sure it has less to do with computers"
> someone felt that it's a sexist remark Ignoring for a moment whether that's "sexist", can we agree that if those 27 scientific papers are to be believed, such remarks directly hurt women in computer science who would otherwise be do better? |
|
|